Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 10:01:55 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Bash and extension searches
In-Reply-To: <3B425A63.16607.3C4DA4@localhost>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010704100138.3231U-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Mark E. wrote:

> > With such a design, __spawnve doesn't need to change its API
> 
> Actually, it can't change its api since it's a stub for spawnve.

Of course.  ``API'' was bad wording on my part; I actually meant the
functionality that is provided by __spawnve, not its calling sequence.