X-Sent: 4 Jul 2001 00:33:23 GMT
Message-ID: <002901c10421$1423b1c0$e33e1d18@nycap.rr.com>
From: "Matthew Conte" <matt AT conte DOT com>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010703150917 DOT 19306L-100000 AT is>
Subject: Re: malloc() problem, DJDEV 203
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2001 20:34:24 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2479.0006
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>

> If that doesn't work, I think we can safely decline anything above 2GB,
> which will avoid the signed/unsigned nuisance (inside malloc as well).

careful:  sbrk() will accept negative values.  i saw carmack do this in the
quake source (amongst other djgpp tricks... =).

regards,
matthew.