From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>, "Mark E." <snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com>
Cc: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject: Re: Bash and extension searches
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2001 15:53:51 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIEEBACFAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010702132834.4695C-100000@is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> A separate question is whether we are sure what Bash does today is 
> correct.  I was under an impression that some people in this thread 
> didn't think so.  I think Tim wanted an extensionless shell script be 
> invoked in preference to a .exe program, and I'm not sure whether Bash 
> does that.
> 
From what Mark wrote, bash does, but __spawnve overrides that decision
(tacking on the .exe if it's found).