From: "Laurynas Biveinis" Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 22:03:08 +0200 To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: bash 2.04 build failure? Message-ID: <20010629220308.B545@lauras.lt> Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com References: <3395-Wed20Jun2001200621+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3B3890D8 DOT 12023 DOT 1A6E91 AT localhost> <20010628184544 DOT B205 AT lauras DOT lt> <20010629142627 DOT B205 AT lauras DOT lt> <3395-Fri29Jun2001175316+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20010629174913 DOT C659 AT lauras DOT lt> <6436-Fri29Jun2001200811+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6436-Fri29Jun2001200811+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > It looks like Bash should generally prefer scripts to programs, and > .exe programs to raw COFF programs. Is that true? Well, I might have skipped something in this discussion, but IMHO scripts over programs preference is not neccesarry. What is needed is to put .bat and .com at the end of search list and .exe before extensionless. Just what did bash do in its own copy of dosexec.c previously? It worked very good. Laurynas