Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 20:08:11 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: lauras AT softhome DOT net
Message-Id: <6436-Fri29Jun2001200811+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <20010629174913.C659@lauras.lt>
Subject: Re: bash 2.04 build failure?
References: <3395-Wed20Jun2001200621+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3B3890D8 DOT 12023 DOT 1A6E91 AT localhost> <20010628184544 DOT B205 AT lauras DOT lt> <20010629142627 DOT B205 AT lauras DOT lt> <3395-Fri29Jun2001175316+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20010629174913 DOT C659 AT lauras DOT lt>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:49:13 +0200
> 
> > Also, I thought you wanted the extensionless program toi run at the
> > expense of the one with extension, no?  
> 
> Yes...
> 
> > At least I think Tim and Mark
> > wanted that.  But you seem to say that running the extensionless
> > program is harmful in this case.
>  
> ...and yes, but the later is quite clear fact. There should be another
> reason, of course, and some additional debugging won't harm.

It looks like Bash should generally prefer scripts to programs, and
.exe programs to raw COFF programs.  Is that true?