Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:37:39 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Message-Id: <5832-Fri29Jun2001173739+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <20010629145658.A205@lauras.lt>
Subject: Re: Suggested wc204.txi entry for gettext changes
References:  <20010629145658 DOT A205 AT lauras DOT lt>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:56:58 +0200
> 
> Is following OK?
> 
> @findex gettext AT r{, name clash}
> @findex gettext AT r{, from @file{conio.h}}
> @findex gettext AT r{, from @acronym{GNU} Gettext}
> A name conflict between @code{gettext} declared in @file{conio.h} and
> @code{gettext} provided by @acronym{GNU} Gettext has been resolved.

It's okay, except one minor aspect: it is not useful to have several
index entries pointing to the same place and beginning with the same
word (in this case, they all start with "gettext").  So I suggest this
single index entry instead:

  @findex gettext AT r{, name clash, @file{conio.h} vs @acronym{GNU} Gettext}