X-Sent: 28 Jun 2001 01:26:40 GMT
Message-ID: <001e01c0ff71$7ff31bc0$e33e1d18@nycap.rr.com>
From: "Matthew Conte" <matt AT conte DOT com>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References:  <Pine DOT A41 DOT 4 DOT 05 DOT 10106270853390 DOT 48870-100000 AT ieva06 DOT lanet DOT lv> <2110-Wed27Jun2001201114+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:27:29 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2479.0006
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2479.0006
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>

> Since the linker script needs to match both the compiler and the
> linker (and also the library), we might have a situation in the
> future, perhaps near future, that a new Binutils release will need to
> modify the linker script, say, to prevent the linker from crashing at
[...]

maybe i'm missing the bus on this one, but shouldn't the linker script be
built-in, anyway?  at least it is on the other main GNU toolchain i am using
right now (arm-elf).

regards,
matthew.