Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 17:51:55 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
In-Reply-To: <200106261640.MAA08088@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010627175056.1111A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, DJ Delorie wrote:

> > In general, I'd like to avoid to have two or more linker script in
> > different places.  We've had this with specs before, and I'm still
> > healing the wounds ;-)
> 
> I agree, but we can't seem to agree on a way of doing that that solves
> those types of problems in every case.  We can still work towards that
> solution, but I'd like to get something released last week.

Once we let the geenie out of the bottle, there's no way to get it
back.

What you suggest is what Andris wanted to do in the first place.  But if 
I'm the only one who's against, feel free to disregard that.