From: "Tim Van Holder" <tim DOT van DOT holder AT pandora DOT be>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: gcc 3.0 released
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 17:35:17 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEGKOHJKAAFPKOCLHDIMEMCCEAA.tim.van.holder@pandora.be>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A41.4.05.10106251716160.46808-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> One more problem is dxegen failure on gcc-3.0 compiled object files due to
> .comment section (it misinterprets it as unresolved reference). In last
> time I patched dxegen.c to workaround this problem (ignore .comment), but
> I'm almost sure Eli would not like such patch

I recall having a similar problem with .stab* sections, though that was
mostly due to ld -S not stripping the debug info.  I would say that it is
not a bad thing for dxegen to drop sections it doesn't know about (as long
as it gives a decent warning).