Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 18:09:33 +0300 From: "Eli Zaretskii" Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il To: "Mark E." Message-Id: <9003-Sun17Jun2001180932+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <3B2C8373.13286.11F8C5@localhost> (snowball3@bigfoot.com) Subject: Re: sysconf addition References: <3B2C8373 DOT 13286 DOT 11F8C5 AT localhost> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > From: "Mark E." > Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 10:16:19 -0400 > > This patch adds _SC_V6_ILP32_OFF32 to show that djgpp supports a 32-bit > environment. > > Index: include/unistd.h > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/include/unistd.h,v > retrieving revision 1.11 > diff -c -p -r1.11 unistd.h > *** include/unistd.h 2001/06/14 02:44:26 1.11 > --- include/unistd.h 2001/06/17 05:08:46 > *************** extern "C" { > *** 61,66 **** > --- 61,67 ---- > #undef _POSIX_SAVED_IDS > #define _POSIX_VDISABLE -1 > #define _POSIX_VERSION 199009L > + #define _POSIX_V6_ILP32_OFF32 0 Shouldn't this be a positive number (e.g., 1)? We do support the 32-bit environment, and we _always_ support it, so we should return a non-zero value, according to my understanding of the Posix draft. Did I miss something?