Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 23:14:35 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Message-Id: <9791-Sat16Jun2001231435+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3B2B838E.50C181B0@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:04:30 +0100)
Subject: Re: Update for symlinks and LS_COLORS
References: <3B2B6B87 DOT 36D691DD AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <7704-Sat16Jun2001175813+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3B2B838E DOT 50C181B0 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2001 17:04:30 +0100
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> > >
> > > OK to commit?
> > 
> > Something's wrong with these diffs: Patch rejects it.  And I cannot
> > blame it: look at the patch and you will see that both the `old' and
> > `new' parts add lines(??).
> 
> It looks like my mail software wrapped the lines - the changed lines
> should start with a '!'. The next non-whitespace character is '+', hence
> the confusion, if it wraps onto a new line.
> 
> I've attached the diff this time. Hope that's better.

Yes, it's much better.  I think this can go in, as it doesn't do any
harm with the stock Fileutils binaries which don't support symlinks.

I have two small requests, though: (1) could you tell what colors will
be used by the new entries you added? and (2) please put a short note
about this change into wc204.txi.

Thanks!