From: rjvdboon AT hetnet DOT nl
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: getconf v2
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 14:36:09 +0200
Message-ID: <b8df01c0f597$c1302a80$e76897c2@hetnet.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
Thread-Index: AcD1l8EwusLvrWF6EdWjcABQi2b8cg==
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Please forgive me my ignorance, but the subject line says:
"getconf v2".
Should the executable be named getconf of getopt?
If the first, then the following lines are incorrect.

>  fprintf(stderr, "Usage: getopt [-h] [sysvar] [pathvar path]\n");

>  fprintf(stderr, "Usage: getopt sysvar\n");

Bye now,
 Robert