Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 21:41:49 +0300
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-Id: <9003-Wed13Jun2001214149+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <3B278E46.6870.A077C9@localhost> (pavenis@lanet.lv)
Subject: Re: GCC-3.0 related problem with src/libc/stubs/stubXXXX.S
References: <3B27870A DOT 168 DOT 843261 AT localhost> <3B278E46 DOT 6870 DOT A077C9 AT localhost>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 16:01:10 +0300
> 
> Verified gcc-2.95.3 doesn't feed cpp_spec to tradcpp0. gcc-3.0 does.
> So for gcc-2.95.3 -imacros and -remap were excluded for tradcpp0 
> 
> > Also, this seems to suggest that "gcc -traditional" will not pick up the 
> > __DJGPP__ and __DJGPP_MINOR__ symbols, and also will not be able to 
> > automatically find some of the C++ headers which need -remap, and that 
> > this side effect cannot be cured by changes in specs.  Is that true?
> 
> True.

Ugh!  This means that any program compiled with -traditional is in
danger of some breakage.

Thanks for checking this.