Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 10:19:42 -0400 Message-Id: <200106131419.KAA00731@envy.delorie.com> X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f From: DJ Delorie To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <20010613090341.B25907@kendall.sfbr.org> (message from JT Williams on Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:03:41 -0500) Subject: Re: fsdb and .exe files from djasm References: <20010613090341 DOT B25907 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk > I am surprised to find that I cannot use fsdb to step through stub.exe, > or any other djasm-generated .exe file. I suspect fsdb is gagging on some > aspect of djasm's exe header, but this is mostly a guess. Can anyone > shed some light on this? It seems desirable for djasm to generate .exe > files that behave as .exe files should (whatever that might be). fsdb is a 32-bit p-mode debugger and djasm produces 16-bit r-mode code. Do you really expect this to work? In general, *any* debugger is going to have problems debugging code that switches CPU modes. You really need an ICE to debug those (and there have been many times I wish I had one) or at least a chip simulator.