Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 16:51:30 -0400 Message-Id: <200106052051.QAA08255@envy.delorie.com> X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f From: DJ Delorie To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: [philb AT gnu DOT org: 2.11.1] Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com FYI for those of you playing with the latest binutils. ------- Start of forwarded message ------- Mailing-List: contact binutils-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: binutils-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com To: binutils AT sources DOT redhat DOT com Cc: gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org Subject: 2.11.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-860142670P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 21:45:53 +0100 From: Philip Blundell - --==_Exmh_-860142670P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii It would be pretty bad form to allow GCC 3.0 to ship before the next release of binutils. I'm tentatively planning to make a 2.11.1 release (from the branch, obviously) in a week's time. As ever, please test the branch on your favourite targets. If anybody knows of outstanding issues that need to be addressed either in binutils 2.11.1 for its own sake, or because they are needed for GCC, speak up now. p. - --==_Exmh_-860142670P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian) iD8DBQE7HUUBVTLPJe9CT30RAjTaAJ0QdOOXP7tzBy0AY+Xxzs9Ss54JVQCggAEn Aq75AP502zD2P1jAM12WWPs= =QSQJ - -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - --==_Exmh_-860142670P-- ------- End of forwarded message -------