X-Authentication-Warning: kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2001 13:01:46 -0600
From: JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: zippo 0.1.3 alpha 1
Message-ID: <20010223130146.A1999@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <3A96A2B8 DOT 372C555D AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3A96A2B8.372C555D@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>; from rich@phekda.freeserve.co.uk on Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 05:49:44PM +0000
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

-: I'd
-: appreciate any feedback about zippo - the program itself, DSM format,
-: DSMs, documentation, whatever.

It seems awkward to refer to the authors of our DJGPP ports
as `porters' (given the usual meaning of `porter').  How about
the following change?

Instead of this:

porter:
porter-email:
porting-web-site:

use this:

ported-by:
ported-by-email:
ported-by-web-site: