From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv To: "Eli Zaretskii" , djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 18:13:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Upcoming gcc-2.95.3 [WAS: Re: GCC: DJGPP bootstrap fix + define MSDOS] Message-ID: <3A9556D3.24451.7D88C8@localhost> In-reply-to: <3028-Fri09Feb2001122621+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> References: <3A83DDDB DOT 27937 DOT 17876C AT localhost> (pavenis AT lanet DOT lv) X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 9 Feb 2001, at 12:26, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv > > Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:08:59 +0200 > > > > The situation is different with gcc-3.0: as far as I understood gcc-2.97 > > currently cannot be bootstrapped for DJGPP if -mbnu210 is not > > removed. > > I'm confused: I thought you suggested to make it the default as the > solution for gcc-3.0. > > > Maybe it's possible to still provide these options simply for > > compatibility for some time without actually using them > > That is certainly a good idea. I think we should try not to break > existing packages. The question is whether to make -mbnu210 the default for upcoming gcc-2.95.3 as it perhaps will be releases rather soon. I think that -mbnu210 should be default also there. I'll intend to build gcc-2.95.3 for DJGPP using binutils-2.9.1 so one will be able to use option -mno-bnu210. Currently native build seems to work Ok (gcc-2.95.3.test4). Remaining part is to clean scripts for building DJGPP targeted cross-compiler and cross-building native compiler for DJGPP (I'm able to check that under Linux only). It's possible that I'll build binary packages of gcc-2.95.3 for DJGPP under Linux. I could also provide Linux to DJGPP cross-compiler binaries (glibc-2.2 or above required) Andris