Message-ID: <20010214153401.951.qmail@lauras.lt>
From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:34:01 +0200
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: PATCH: new djtar option
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <20010212200601 DOT 786 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1010213090508 DOT 25782A AT is> <20010213155608 DOT 236 DOT qmail AT lauras DOT lt> <9003-Tue13Feb2001215538+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To: <9003-Tue13Feb2001215538+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>; from eliz@is.elta.co.il on Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 09:55:39PM +0200
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> Look at the function djtar.c:change -- if the isdir member of the
> struct has the value of 2, all the files under that directory are
> skipped.

Thanks for your help.

> The problem is it currently calls that function only under certain
> conditions.  If you change those conditions, or duplicate the code,
> all the pieces will fall in place.

It seems that change() is tied too much to user interaction, and
logging user-made changes. And for duplicating the code - I've already
done that in my previous patch.

Laurynas