Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:09:47 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: namespace std and libstdc++ V3
In-Reply-To: <20010213155728.246.qmail@lauras.lt>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010214090927.9705B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Laurynas Biveinis wrote:

> > Are you talking about the <*.h> headers or the <c*> headers?
> > I understand that Stephen was working on allowing C++ programs to
> > include the <*.h> headers.
> 
> I'm just talking about three different ways without going into details. 

Would it make sense to ask Stephen to continue sending changes for the
headers and commit them, and leave the issue of libstdc++ interaction
for later?  Backing up changes is easy with CVS, if we need to do that
later.