Message-ID: <20010209094544.9143.qmail@lauras.lt>
From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:45:44 +0200
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: stddef.h - namespace std patch
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <002801c091fe$f81f5ea0$a2d9883e AT oemcomputer>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To: <002801c091fe$f81f5ea0$a2d9883e@oemcomputer>; from djgpp@argentum.freeserve.co.uk on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 06:43:00PM -0000
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 06:43:00PM -0000, Stephen Silver wrote:
> I tried looking when you mentioned shadow headers before.  I downloaded
> their latest snapshot: it mentioned the shadow headers in the README,
> but the directories mentioned were not present.  I also looked at the
> CVS, and found that the 'shadow' directory is empty - everything seems
> to have been deleted from it three months ago.  If there is something
> else I should be looking at, then please tell me what it is.

Current CVS has libstdc++-v3/include/c_std/bits directory, full of namespace
std wrappers for standard headers.

> But I don't see how the problem can be solved satisfactorily from
> the GCC side, whereas I have *already* solved it (at least to my
> satisfaction) from the DJGPP side.

I'm not saying your work is obsolete; what I'm saying is that your solution
should work together with libstdc++ V3.

Laurynas