Date: Fri, 09 Feb 2001 10:29:45 +0200
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender: halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To: "Stephen Silver" <djgpp AT argentum DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Message-Id: <2561-Fri09Feb2001102945+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer: Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.3.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.6
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <002801c091fe$f81f5ea0$a2d9883e@oemcomputer>
	(djgpp AT argentum DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk)
Subject: Re: stddef.h - namespace std patch
References:  <002801c091fe$f81f5ea0$a2d9883e AT oemcomputer>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> From: "Stephen Silver" <djgpp AT argentum DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 18:43:00 -0000
> 
> But I don't see how the problem can be solved satisfactorily from
> the GCC side, whereas I have *already* solved it (at least to my
> satisfaction) from the DJGPP side.

I agree.  (Do we even know for sure that libstdc++ v3 doesn't have
problems with DJGPP?)