Message-ID: <20010208132526.711.qmail@lauras.lt>
From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 15:25:26 +0200
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: setjmp.h - namespace std patch
Mail-Followup-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <002801c09131$90b3c760$9c11893e AT oemcomputer>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
In-Reply-To: <002801c09131$90b3c760$9c11893e@oemcomputer>; from djgpp@argentum.freeserve.co.uk on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 06:12:40PM -0000
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 06:12:40PM -0000, Stephen Silver wrote:
> Here's the setjmp.h patch.  One slight complication here is that the
> C++ standard requires setjmp to be a macro, but DJGPP defines it as
> a function.  I don't think this is really a problem, so rather than

If this should be a macro, an user could '#undef setjmp' and complain.
Maybe '#define setjmp setjmp' would help?

Laurynas