Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:20:53 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Stephen Silver <djgpp AT argentum DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
cc: DJGPP Workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: wctype.h and STLport
In-Reply-To: <002701c09131$61f2c8e0$9c11893e@oemcomputer>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010208102033.20284O-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Stephen Silver wrote:

> I'm trying out STLport with DJGPP, and I've found that the
> <cwctype> header causes errors.  It turns out that this is
> because DJGPP doesn't declare all the functions that are
> supposed to be declared in wctype.h.  Is there any objection
> to declaring these functions, even though DJGPP doesn't yet
> implement them?

I agree with DJ: this is not a good idea.  We actually had complaints
and FAQs about unimplemented functions whose prototypes were in the
headers.  We would like to avoid that.