From: Martin Stromberg Message-Id: <199911071239.NAA02352@propus.lu.erisoft.se> Subject: Re: binutils building problem To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Sun, 7 Nov 1999 13:39:22 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: from "pavenis@lanet.lv" at Nov 6, 99 05:28:20 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk Andris said: > On 6 Nov 99, at 15:05, Martin Str|mberg wrote: > Just joke > > cd c:\djgpp > rm -vf @manifest/bnu281s.mft Right! He-he! > > Third problem: strange link message while building binutils 2.9.1: > > Well, there's nothing stopping me now, I thought, let's go for > > binutils 2.9.1. It seems to make correctly, but I get these strange > > messages from the make process (the first two): > > > > "gcc -g -o size size.o bucomm.o version.o filemode.o ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a > > f:/djgpp/bin/ld.exe: size: warning: .text: line number overflow: 0x16f8b > 0xffff" > > > > and > > > > "gcc -g -o objdump objdump.o prdbg.o rddbg.o debug.o stabs.o ieee.o rdcoff.o bucomm.o version.o filemode.o ../opcodes/.libs/libopcodes.a ../bfd/.libs/libbfd.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a > > f:/djgpp/bin/ld.exe: objdump: warning: .text: line number overflow: 0x1b314 > 0xffff" > > > > There are a total of 16 of such warnings. Are they be taken as > > "comiplation failed" or are they harmless? What do they mean (if you > > know)? > > > > There will be problems with debug info (COFF limitations). Unless You > are going to debug binutils You can ignore them. Or specify > CFLAGS=-O2 Ok. There isn't anything that can make the debugging work? I don't _think_ I'll need that but later on I'll surely will (Murphy's law...). > One more question: did You apply patch to fix problem with local > labels I mentioned? No, it's a pure tar-ball from a gnu mirror. Where can I get it? I don't really need it - right now I don't care if the binaries are bloated as long as they function. > If You want, I can make available some of my builds of recent binutils > snapshots Do they include ELF as a target? (Don't tell anyone but I'm examining the possibility to move DJGPP to ELF.) Oldfield, Turbular Bells III, MartinS