Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 11:45:25 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Holejsovsky, Pavel" <PHolejs AT rkk DOT cz>
cc: "'djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com'" <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: FAT32 detection
In-Reply-To: <B0876599D6FCD2118CDA0060973136621D4756@mail.rkk.cz>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990915114428.27871D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Holejsovsky, Pavel wrote:

> No. NT does not support FAT32 at all, not only for its dos box.

Then returning FAT16 for NTFS seems to be the right thing (although we 
should document that this is only based on a functional equivalence).