Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 12:27:48 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer" <markus DOT oberhumer AT jk DOT uni-linz DOT ac DOT at>
cc: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: RE: gcc-2.95
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.990909214537.markus.oberhumer@jk.uni-linz.ac.at>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990913122632.8713G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer wrote:

> Probably the best way is to default to 
> `-march=i386 -mcpu=pentium' in the specs, i.e.
> generate code that runs on all i386 CPUs but
> optimize for the i586 (this also influences
> default alignment et. al.).
> 
> Rebuilding or reconfiguring gcc should not be
> necessary (unless gcc was compiled with -march=pentium
> itself).

I agree.

Andris, isn't it enough to just rebuild libstdc++, and use the defaults 
suggested above in specs?  If that's not enough, why not?