From: "Paul D. Smith" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14290.49671.421714.778878@baynetworks.com> Date: Sun, 5 Sep 1999 15:18:31 -0400 (EDT) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: Esa A E Peuha , Laszlo Molnar , djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Make 3.78 is in pretest (fwd) In-Reply-To: References: <14275 DOT 64667 DOT 739010 DOT 922179 AT baynetworks DOT com> X-Mailer: VM 6.73 under Emacs 20.4.1 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk %% Eli Zaretskii writes: ez> While running tests in different environments, I found something that ez> looks like a bug: "echo" is not mentioned as the built-in shell ez> command for the Unixy shell. The reason is that the original Unix ez> code doesn't do that either (see sh_cmds[] array in ez> job.c:construct_command_argv_internal). ez> I suspect that this is a bug, at least in the MSDOS branch, but before ez> I go ahead and add "echo", could you please tell why does the Unix ez> version omits it? Because many UNIX shells don't have a builtin echo. In fact, I'd say the large majority of /bin/sh's on UNIX systems don't have one, and /bin/sh is the shell make defaults to using. If all MSDOS shells do have it (what's out there besides bash?), then there's no reason not to introduce it for MSDOS, tho. I'll look at the rest of these changes, thx. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Paul D. Smith Network Management Development "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- These are my opinions---Nortel Networks takes no responsibility for them.