From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-ID: <B0000097257@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 13:30:12 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: config.guess patch for new uname()
References: <B0000097225 AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990805131304.26925D-100000@is>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On 5 Aug 99, at 13:16, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> 
> On Thu, 5 Aug 1999 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:
> 
> > If we are going change uname I should patch config.guess in 
> > gcc-2.95.
> 
> I didn't check in the change yet.  I'd prefer people to see how many 
> packages does it break, before I make up my mind.  Laurynas says it only 
> breaks Autoconf, but it seems there are more packages that will need 
> changes.  If there are too many, I think we should defer this to the next 
> release, and in the meantime config.guess changes will propagate into the 
> GNU sources.
> 

I think it will break many packages as config.guess is in many of 
them (like gcc-2.95). If we are not going to put it in, then I'll leaving
it for next update of DJGPP port of gcc (maybe gcc-2.95.1)

Andris