Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 13:16:03 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: config.guess patch for new uname()
In-Reply-To: <B0000097225@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990805131304.26925D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 5 Aug 1999 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:

> If we are going change uname I should patch config.guess in 
> gcc-2.95.

I didn't check in the change yet.  I'd prefer people to see how many 
packages does it break, before I make up my mind.  Laurynas says it only 
breaks Autoconf, but it seems there are more packages that will need 
changes.  If there are too many, I think we should defer this to the next 
release, and in the meantime config.guess changes will propagate into the 
GNU sources.