Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 09:51:35 -0400
Message-Id: <199908031351.JAA15445@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990803103233.1847B-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Tue, 3 Aug 1999 10:33:28 +0300 (IDT))
Subject: Re: Changes in Binutils 2.9.1
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990803103233 DOT 1847B-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


From what I've seen of gnu makefiles, they'd go to some lengths to
avoid running the rule twice if it failed, using a stamp file.
Otherwise, this will probably work OK for us.

>    go32stub.h: go32stub.dist
>      	(stubify -g stub.exe && bin2h ...) &> /dev/null || cp -p $< $@
> 
> (I omitted the bin2h arguments for brevity).  Isn't this good enough?