Sender: nate AT cartsys DOT com Message-ID: <37969D4B.609FBC62@cartsys.com> Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 21:25:47 -0700 From: Nate Eldredge X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.10 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: No more warnings... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Incidentally, one of the big changes with gcc 2.95 is that the ANSI aliasing rules are now strictly enforced by default. The relevant docs section follows: ---------------------------------------------------- -fstrict-aliasing Allows the compiler to assume the strictest aliasing rules applicable to the language being compiled. For C (and C++), this activates optimizations based on the type of expressions. In particular, an object of one type is assumed never to reside at the same address as an object of a different type, unless the types are almost the same. For example, an unsigned int can alias an int, but not a void* or a double. A character type may alias any other type. Pay special attention to code like this: union a_union { int i; double d; }; int f() { a_union t; t.d = 3.0; return t.i; } The practice of reading from a different union member than the one most recently written to (called "type-punning") is common. Even with `-fstrict-aliasing', type-punning is allowed, provided the memory is accessed through the union type. So, the code above will work as expected. However, this code might not: int f() { a_union t; int* ip; t.d = 3.0; ip = &t.i; return *ip; } Every language that wishes to perform language-specific alias analysis should define a function that computes, given an tree node, an alias set for the node. Nodes in different alias sets are not allowed to alias. For an example, see the C front-end function c_get_alias_set. ------------------------------------------------- Linux, for example, is having some troubles with this, since the kernel is full of such code, and currently GCC will handle it by generating the "wrong" code but not issuing warnings. Before gcc 2.95 comes into wide use, it might be wise to audit libc for suspicious code and fix it. Or else, arrange to compile it with -fno-strict-aliasing. -- Nate Eldredge nate AT cartsys DOT com