Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 13:12:35 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Erik Berglund <erik2 DOT berglund AT telia DOT com>
cc: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
        pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Subject: Re: Re: gcc-crash - and a possible solution
In-Reply-To: <MAPI.Id.0016.00333138303633303030303930303057@MAPI.to.RFC822>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990706130902.17419E-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 6 Jul 1999, Erik Berglund wrote:

> Charles Sandmann wrote:
> 
> > I did lots of testing on Win 3.1 (not 3.11) but avoided multitasking there
> > since it crashed frequently.  Win 95 definitely shows the >2gb address 
> > behavior if you multitask the right programs.
> 
> Then >2gb may happen on Win 95, for instance by using two DOS boxes
> (as pointed out in your message of 24 Jun 1999).

If you mean two DOS boxes with *any* DJGPP programs, not necessarily GCC, 
then I always do that.  On my office machine, running Windows 95, there's 
always one DOS box with Emacs, another with Info, and I use two other for 
command-line tasks, including compiling programs.  I never had any 
crashes in CC1 like what you see.