Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 08:04:15 -0400
Message-Id: <199906291204.IAA20282@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <19990629134730.57318@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> (message from Jan
	Hubicka on Tue, 29 Jun 1999 13:47:30 +0200)
Subject: Re: Regparm and asm statements.. what now?
References:  <19990629134730 DOT 57318 AT atrey DOT karlin DOT mff DOT cuni DOT cz>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> I have new few days to play with the regparmized libc code, so I
> would like to know your opinions and if it does have chance to get
> into official distribution.

It has little chance of replacing the default libraries, simply
because every third-party toolkit out there would have to be
recompiled to match it.  More likely, it would end up as a separate
zip file for those who really need the performance increase.

I have no problem letting the official sources support it, as long as
it doesn't interfere with support for the default case also, and as
long as someone else does the work ;-)