Date: Thu, 10 Jun 1999 11:12:02 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: {v,}snprintf.c ???
In-Reply-To: <199906092043.QAA09707@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990610110715.17697P-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 9 Jun 1999, DJ Delorie wrote:

> I'm OK with adding this, as long as the prototypes in stdio.h don't
> cause conflicts with packages that provide their own *snprintf
> functions.

That's a bummer.  I don't think I saw any package that uses those
functions, so I have no way of knowing what would cause any
conflicts.

Can somebody please look at existing code which uses these functions
and tell me what declarations do they use.

OTOH, since C9X includes them, perhaps declaring these functions as
C9X does is good enough?