Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 15:16:03 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: egcs-19990602 (gcc-2.95 prerelease) binaries for testing
In-Reply-To: <B0000089563@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990607151300.11242A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 7 Jun 1999 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:

> +	"bindir=`echo '$(bindir)' | sed -e 's/\\$$/\\\\&&/g'`" \

Thanks.  Do these tricks survive recursive configure scripts (where the 
top-level configure invokes configure scripts in subdirectories)?  Does 
EGCS use such recursive scripts in its build procedure?