From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
Message-ID: <c686bf7c.2479bcbc@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 16:19:08 EDT
Subject: Re: New Keyword for C
To: ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se (Martin Str|mberg)
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Dear Martin Str|mberg,

On 05-23-99 at 16:00:41 EST you wrote:
>
> K.B. said:
> > When will gcc x.yy support these?
>
> When they are implemented of course.
>

Thanks for the obvious answer.

> There's no use asking for features, unless you are willing to implement
> them.

I volunteer to help.  Where do I go next?

> _If_ they make it to the standard, the likelyhood of them being
> implemented increases. But you never know. Or when.
>

_If_?  Isn't `restrict' in the same category as the three that
were cited in my previous letter?

_Bool
_Complex
_Imaginary

Do we know that `restrict' will "make it to the standard?"


K.B. Williams