Sender: richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com
Message-ID: <373F5072.94B595BE@bigfoot.com>
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 00:10:42 +0100
From: Richard Dawe <richdawe AT bigfoot DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.1 i586)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP installer [Was: Script language for installer]
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990516133647 DOT 26252I-100000 AT is> <373F1921 DOT 4260ED92 AT softhome DOT net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
> (At first there were two other groups - "C+ development" and
> "Objective-C development" but they were not useful, just another name
> to gpp*b.zip and obj-c compiler). So my idea is to have these two groups
> and a many ungrouped but related zips.

I guess the whole point of this is to give zips "friendly" names, so
newbies aren't intimidated. So I don't think it matters a lot that you
just have one zip per group. BTW the groups could be implemented as
follows:

name: C development
requires: djdev >= 2.00
requires: gcc >= 2.7.2
requires: make >= 3.74
...etc...

> What about it? (However, I still have not decided, should LBInstDJ do
> just first time install or provide front-end for all zippo's functions?

IMHO all management. But let's get something working first & we can decide
later.