Message-ID: <373C384D.14732824@softhome.net>
Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 16:50:53 +0200
From: Laurynas Biveinis <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP installer [Was: Script language for installer]
References: <000601be8f2e$860fc2c0$86033bd4 AT default> <3739D966 DOT ADE9216A AT bigfoot DOT com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> My intention is not for djgpppm to replace LBInstDJ, but to supplement it.

Actually LBInstDJ's development is moving ahead at the speed of turtle
:(
due to my lack of time. I think we should cooperate.

> I think the scripting language/dependency database should have the same
> format.

I agree. 

BTW, do you group zips into units which provide some level of 
functionality, e.g. "C development" would include gcc*b.zip & co, or
just 
keep them separated and require user to know which zips he must install 
for C, which for C++ and so on? In this case, your tool would be
back-end
for mine. And script file should be changed to reflect this.

Laurynas Biveinis