Date: Thu, 6 May 1999 10:09:28 -0400
Message-Id: <199905061409.KAA12159@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
CC: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990506134042.15114D-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Thu, 6 May 1999 13:48:57 +0300 (IDT))
Subject: Re: Signals' behavior
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990506134042 DOT 15114D-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


I'm reluctant to change signal handling just before a release, just to
please a spec.  Has anyone complained about how our signals are
handled?  If not, let's revisit this after the release.