Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 18:49:31 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Subject: Re: __dpmi_int causes trouble in signals
In-Reply-To: <199905021432.KAA05556@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990502184649.136B-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 2 May 1999, DJ Delorie wrote:

> Thanks for your effort in looking into this.  On a first review your fix
> below sounds like a very good idea.  As you've probably noticed, I've been
> on vacation and don't have much time in the next few days to look at it
> much harder.  I would like to see a bit of testing with this fix - probably
> putting it into the next alpha release would be a good idea to see if it
> breaks anything.  It certainly fixes something, and your explaination
> is very likely.  You get an A+ for investigation on this!

Ah, yes, I recall this now.  Thanks for finding this, DJ.

Charles, could you possibly have any clues how can this change break 
the signal machinery in the way I described in the previous message?

Thanks.