Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 10:05:35 -0400
Message-Id: <199905021405.KAA05310@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990502111803.563N-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Sun, 2 May 1999 11:18:19 +0300 (IDT))
Subject: Re: fork/exec/wait -> system .... More problems. CygWin is that bad?
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990502111803 DOT 563N-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> If we would to decide that having less zips is a good idea, there
> should be no problem to provide one or two large archives with
> everything.

Perhaps someone could ressurect the 'ez-gcc" package, but I don't want
to stop providing the separate zips.

> I thought splitting the DJGPP distribution was a deliberate decision,

It was.  It accomodates FSF release schedules.