Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 09:51:29 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [dma AT hpesdma DOT fc DOT hp DOT com: Performance Observation]
In-Reply-To: <m10c8II-000S74C@inti.gov.ar>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990428095032.25283D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:

> > The performance drop seems to be an alignment problem. Specifically, with the
> > fft benchmark, gcc 2.7.2 is faster than gcc 2.8.1. There is no considerable
> > differnce in the generated code, and some experiments with mixed compilation
> > seem to confim this. Recent version of egcs are supposed to fix this.
> 
> Check this:
> 
> http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/compila.html

Salvador, did I miss something in this page?  I don't find there anything 
that is related to alignment.