Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 19:48:36 -0400
Message-Id: <199904262348.TAA25924@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <199904262308.XAA92124@out1.ibm.net> (snowball3@usa.net)
Subject: Re: fsext patches for dup and dup2
References: <199904252128 DOT VAA51774 AT out4 DOT ibm DOT net> (snowball3 AT usa DOT net) <199904262308 DOT XAA92124 AT out1 DOT ibm DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> That fine. That means the third version is out. Any problems with 
> second (the one moved the fsext handler call to after the handle 
> equality test)?

I hope you'll all pardon me taking my time about these things, but
time is not something I have in abundance these days.  I've put it in
my todo folder.  I'll get to it when I can, unless Eli gets to it
before me.  Meanwhile, if you come to some consensus about it, I'll go
along with that also.  I'm content to add my opinions as I think of
them, and leave the details to those who are most concerned with them.

Egads, I'm delegating!  ;-)