Date: Sun, 25 Apr 1999 18:42:17 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: v2.03: wrapping up
In-Reply-To: <199904251428.KAA08930@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990425184129.7199D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Sun, 25 Apr 1999, DJ Delorie wrote:

> I don't think there will be a *good* solution, but we have *a*
> solution, which is that <stdio.h> and a few other common includes will
> update __DJGPP_MINOR__ in 2.03 and later.

This means that specs needs to not define these symbols, otherwise its 
definition will take precedence, no?