Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 10:32:38 -0400
Message-Id: <199904201432.KAA10166@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <199904200351.DAA60342@out4.ibm.net> (snowball3@usa.net)
Subject: Re: patch for typo in fsext.txh
References: <199904200033 DOT AAA101378 AT out2 DOT ibm DOT net> (snowball3 AT usa DOT net) <199904200351 DOT DAA60342 AT out4 DOT ibm DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> Ok, I did an update and got 1.5. But when I sent the cvs diff 
> command above, shouldn't it have compared my copy against 1.5 
> instead of 1.4?

If you do "cvs update foo.c" followed by "cvs diff foo.c", yes, it
should diff your local copy against the most recent cvs copy.

Also, "cvs log foo.c" will tell you the history of a file, and "cvs
annotate foo.c" will tell you who touched each line and when (if your
cvs supports annotate).