Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 13:54:33 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Stack in djgpp
In-Reply-To: <m10XsfE-000S8ZC@inti.gov.ar>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990418135400.22615N-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote:

> I'll compile the code at home this weekend (with 2.02)

Please be aware of the following gotcha: even if you compile with
v2.02, you could get a v2.01 stub if the stubify step is done by a
linker which has a v2.01 stub built into it.  So either use `stubify'
from v2.02 to produce the .exe, or set up your linker to use a v2.02
stub.

The best way to be sure which stub you get is to look into the binary
(e.g., with "strings -a").