Message-ID: <002c01be8513$b07541e0$ae003bd4@default> From: "Laurynas Biveinis" To: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" , "DJGPP Workers" Subject: Re: LBInstDJ Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 20:36:12 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com >> There is a lot of installation utilities (especially Borland's) which just >> update first autoexec.bat line and that's all. If user user doesn't want old path, >> he has to REM it. And he will be told so in LBInstDJ's warning. If it doesn't >> matter for him - well, it's up to him. I'd like to hear your opinion. > >So as the rest does it wrong you'll do it in the same way. Well, I mentioned it to show that my prg will help for Borland installers, not that they are examples for me... But actually I have thinked and understood that I was WRONG and wasted time for proving bad things. I will more think about your way. How about SET DJGPP=... ? I think it can be safely included in the begining of autoexec.bat regardless is it one or multi configuration? >Then remove the installer from v2 directory because even people that really >knows how to install djgpp will blindly use install. Why? because they don't >know how easy is to install djgpp and the first thing people does is running >install. If no install is provided people reads the readme because is looking >for the installer. Removing from v2 won't help because my installer isn't mentioned in docs anywhere. The readme.1st, zip-picker andother docs must be updated - "if you know how to update path and enviroment settings in autoexec.bat and possibly other system settings, continue reading DJGPP installation instructions. If you are not sure, go to http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/zip-picker.html and get all required archives with installation utility" Or something like it. >> BTW, about user's interface: how about porting it to turbo vision? > >Is possible but (and I'm the maintainer of this port) I think is too huge for >an installer. I looked to Free Pascal Compiler's installer. It is 70-80KBytes and is done with Turbo Vision. My last LBInstDJ.exe build is 59KBytes (not that sfx, but the main prog) Laurynas Biveinis