Message-ID: <B0000082773@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
From: "Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To: Martin Str|mberg <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 1999 15:25:09 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: LFN=y and MS-RAMDRIVE
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <199904091147.NAA23997@father.ludd.luth.se>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.02b14)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 9 Apr 99, at 13:47, Martin Str|mberg wrote:

> You said:
> > At least it is no so for Win95 OSR2. With MS RAMDRIVE.SYS I'm getting
> > output 1 from the same test and I haven't saw any LFN related problems with it.
> > So perhaps it's Win98 related problem.
> 
> I can't believe this! They (RAMDRIVE.SYS) are identical according diff.
> 
> May I ask you how your CONFIG.SYS line that installs the RAMDRIVE
> looks like? And what version it report on start-up?

device=c:\windows\ramdrive.sys 4096 512 256 /e

Maybe setting sector length to 512bytes is significant

> This is my line in my CONFIG.SYS:
> devicehigh=c:\windows\ramdrive.sys 16384 /e
> 
> And it reports "version 3.06" on start-up.

Browsing contents of ramdrive.sys shows version 3.06. (simply I didn't want to 
reboot to see it)

> 
> This is the size of C:\WINDOWS\RAMDRIVE.SYS (according to properties):
> 12 663 bytes
> 

The same

Andris