Message-ID: <00ab01be80fe$b70bb980$4c003bd4@default>
From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <lauras AT softhome DOT net>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: Announce: LBInstDJ the DJGPP installer v0.2
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 1999 15:50:11 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

>We must seriously think whether to enable NameNumericTails=1 under Win9X
>permanently as this have some rather nasty side effects that can even cause
data
>loss in some situations. I have once suceeded to overwrite file I didn't
want to do
>when NameNumericTails=1 were enabled (fortunatelly I had backup copy of
lost
>file) . Another example is libg++ tests for egcs-1.1.2 (also gcc-2.8.1
should have
>the same problem but I have not tested it)  in directory
libg++/etc/PlotFile3D (File
>$DJDIR/lang/cxx/PlotFile.h conflicts with libg++/etc/Plot3D/PlotFile3D.h in
>egcs112s.zip when NameNumericTails=1).

Of course, something must be done there - at first I was planning to create
some BAT
file which user could run to re-enable numeric tails, if he is too lazy to
use regedit by
himself.

>Therefore installation should recommend to patch registry back after
installation.
>It can be done by asking at end of installation whether user wants to
remove
>NameNumericTails=1.

I think it is good way.

>This is also topic that as I think should be in FAQ. I think
NameNuericTails=0
>should not normally be enabled permanently.

Yes, this topic is in the FAQ (22.18) and I think I will copy it to my
lbinstdj.txt.
However, its author does not agree with Andris:

"For what it's worth, I always run my system with numeric tails disabled,
and I have yet to see a single real problem."

So the final decision is up to user, as always.
Laurynas Biveinis