Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 09:17:52 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT usa DOT net>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Bash 2.03 updated March 22nd
In-Reply-To: <199904060349.DAA71396@out5.ibm.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990406091640.6187A-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 5 Apr 1999, Mark E. wrote:

> I configured texinfo from plain DOS once again but on another machine 
> and again without problems. config.log reveals no problems. Both 
> machines have Win95B and were run from its raw DOS mode.

Did you have a memory manager installed on those machines?  I use
QEMM, but maybe EMM386 is also enough (I didn't try that yet).

Win95B also means FAT32, right?  Is the partition used in plain DOS a 
FAT32 one?

> I'm not sure what more I can do to find the problem, except maybe 
> reverting certain changes from the past month and seeing if they help 
> you.

Are the changes between 2.02 and 2.03 so extensive that the diffs
cannot be browsed for possible offenders?